1st October 2013
by Mary Clarke
The challenges of understanding just what is happening in genes on a single-cell level have held back progress in this field. This is because the quantity of genetic data in just one cell is minuscule. The sequencing data gathered from these tiny samples produce ‘noise’ that can distract from what’s really going on in the cell. However, a study published in Nature Methods this week reveals a computational solution that paves the way for further research on molecular biology’s new frontier.
The study ‘Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments’ is the first to use primary data generated by the Single Cell Genomics Centre (SCGC), a joint venture between the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI). The SCGC has a Fluidigm C1 microfluidics system, which was used in this study to sequence mouse immune cells. The results were combined with data from plant cells sequenced at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) in Heidelberg, Germany, and analysed using a quantitative statistical method that distinguishes true biological variability from technical noise.
The researchers found significant variation across the cells when they combined the new technologies and computational methods. Once they had cut out the technical noise, they realised that there were many signals that were not noise at all. For instance, they found 1,198 variations across 91 differentiating cells from the mouse immune system, and 876 variations across seven GL2 plant cells.
The varying genes in the mouse immune cells reflect the two parallel processes of proliferation and differentiation occurring simultaneously in these cells, while the variations in the plant cells are more of a mystery.
Joint corresponding author of the paper and EMBL-EBI scientist, Dr John Marioni explains why these results are surprising, saying, “You don’t necessarily expect gene expression levels to vary significantly across a homogeneous population of cells; you expect, in general, there to be low levels of variability or no difference at all.”
Further research at the SCGC will explore the significance of variability, but Dr Marioni has some theories. “Two things could be going on here,” he says, “either these results are indicative of there being multiple sub-types of cells in the samples, or – the possibility that’s not immediately obvious – that some genes’ expression levels could be regulated tightly while others demonstrate less strong selection.”
The opening of the SCGC this year and the methods described in this first paper will allow researchers at the Sanger Institute and the EMBL-EBI to look at genomics from a slightly different angle. Dr Marioni explains, “Everyone has always been so focussed on overall expression changes, whereas one could argue that, depending upon the system under study, it will be those genes that show higher variation that are of interest. These have the potential to tell you something very deep about the biological system that you’re studying.”
It is hoped that the centre will soon begin to uncover the impact of genetic variability and gene expression on individual cells and different cell types in order to achieve a more profound understanding of biological systems. The researchers hope their findings will lead to practical insights into growth, repair and the development of disease.
Mary Clarke is a member of the Media, PR and Communications team at the Sanger Institute.
- Brennecke, P., Anders, S., Kim, J.K., Kołodziejczyk, A.A., Zhang, X., Proserpio, V., Baying, B., Benes, V., Teichmann, S.A., Marioni, J.C., Heisler, M.G. (2013) Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments Nature Methods ,